Published by Mircea on 09 Mar 2005 at 08:33 pm
IT Solutions in Romania
Note: this is not going to be an advertisment or anything else, this is purely a comment. It represents my own thoughts, as stated in Article 19 in Universal Declaration of Human rights.
Location: POLITEHNICA University - Bucharest > AN010
Time: 13:00 - ~16:00 GMT+2
Main Topic: Tornado Sistems
The offensive of the virtual world, your place and your profession’s place in this world… everything comming from professionals:
* TORNADO - Success in IT - Adrian Mantoiu - Marketing and Cmmunication Manager
* Communication Technologies - Catalina Lehanceanu
* The digital man - mobile, omnipresent, performant - Denis Brandmayer
– source: LSAC
I was informed about this meeting by a colleague of mine and I’ve told myself “Let’s see how the Romanian IT Industry shows itself in 2005. I could even check how a presentation is carried out by Romanians. Let’s see how they handle it, I’ve seen how foreigners do it… let’s make a comparison.” I hava attended a TECHTEAM presentation last year and all I can say is: I was left speachless by the delivery of the presentation. I could see the professionalism of the Belgian delivering the presentation. The content was also interesting. I was introduced to a true application of outsourcing.
Now, to answer some of my first questions.
Q: How did they do the presentation compared to what I’ve seen before?
A: They passed. I enjoyed it, even if it had a touch of “balcanism” (structure, delivery - especially wording).
Q: Did they manage to keep the attention of the listeners active?
A: Well… not quite. Some of the students left after some time. Most likely, they had classes. Even so, not all that left had classes. I bet that if the presentation was oriented more towards what they have to offer us, the presence would have been at least kept constant. Computer Science students are very pragmatic and using allusions (”abureli”) doesn’t make it. If we were given more info on what we should expect from the presentation, it would have been much better.
Now.. about the content:
Idea No. 1: They spoke my words when they were asked details - I really liked that :), especially the network related details. A good proof that there are some real professionals there.
TORNADO - Success in IT
This was an interesting introduction in what Tornado Sistems offers as IT solutions on the Romanian market. (it’s “Sistems” not with “y”, because the Chamber of Commerce didn’t allow using “y” when the company was registered - interesting, isn’t it? no comment). It is a BIG Romanian company - many numberes followed. As far as I know, it’s been on the covers of IT Magazines in Romania for a long time. Concepts, ideas, organisation… all to prove that Tornado Sistems is a real Solutions Provider on the Romanian Market.
I still have in my mind the question I’ve asked: “How much does an employee shown in the organisational flow-chart earn, approximately?” My curiosity wasn’t fulfilled. This seems to be a very well guarded answer. Self-evaluation is very hard to do nowadays, especially in an always changing environment. Figures count. I still have to find the right answer to the question: “What’s my value on the human resources market, in €/$?”
Communication Technologies
Ok, this was what I’ve enjoyed most. Not only the presentation was carried out by a really fine lady, Catalina, but also the really fine lady proved to be a very well informed lady. And, as you all know, when it comes to communication (speaking in this particular case), women do best. All I can say is: Congratulations!
The topics included:
- The future is IP - Triple Play - a solution to deliver Voice (Telephony), Video (TV) and Data (Internet) over IP - advantages over traditional means
- a VPN hardware solution implementing IPsec and it’s usage
The questions section here was interesting. Everyone was thinking of usages for both solutions, making assumptions and trying to figure in deep the inner workings of these technologies. Interest was definitely high on these topics.
The digital man
This last section was passed through in a bit of a hurry most likely because, after receving the top of the cake with the networking presentation, nobody was expecting anything else (and the time allocated for the presentation seemed to have passed) - now that I’m thinking, the really technical questions of the previous section might have borred some of them… but not me.
We’ve been introduced to the latest offerings when it comes to digital gadgets from Canon, BenQ and Philips. The HP Promoter Training I had made his appearance. I kept comparing in my head HP and Canon and I couldn’t help myself asking some question about Canon, having HP as a refference. I am affraid I was assumed to be a HP advocate because of the number of questions I’ve asked which involved HP. Well, the Canon affiliation of the speaker was obvious given the answers and I could sense a little anger. Looking over the situation with a critical eye, I can say the marketing strategies everyone teaches work pretty well
Overall, it was a nice informative presentation about some IT solutions implemented by Tornado. Indeed, the networking soltions are not yet very addopted, but they are quickly gaining the targeted market share. Tornado seems like a nice and adventurous company when it comes to IT solutions. The huge portofolio & contacts (also important) can easily solve any IT problems you (most likely your company) might encounter.
3 Responses to “IT Solutions in Romania”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Cata on 10 Mar 2005 at 9:55 pm #
I’m really sorry but I cannot agree with you. The whole presentation lacked fluence and above all it lacked purpose. You can’t just brag about the company’s performance using two year old data. I pitty them, although my impressions about Tornado were more positive before yesterday.
IceRAM on 10 Mar 2005 at 10:54 pm #
I didn’t say that the presentation was great.
In my opinion, the presentation lacked fluency mostly because they allowed questions being put during the actual delivery (I haven’t seen this happening at other presentations). Besides this, there was too much time allowed for asking questions. Computer Science students are used to well defined limits.
You are right about the presentation lacking purpose. I said the same thing in the 3rd paragraph. The target of the presentation was not clearly defined, even though somebody wanted to make it clear by asking about it. We both know that Computer Science students do not like ideas not clearly defined. Unfortunately, the target of the presentation was not clearly defined and it remained that way for the rest of the presentation.
Using two year old facts is indeed not worth the image of a big company. I have taken it as an error. As I said in my post, all I remember about the first part was: Tornado is big, Tornado is big, Organizational Flowchart, Tornado is big, solutions, brands, Tornado is big. If that’s what they wanted to tell us, they really succeeded.
As our Educational Psychology teacher said today, Computer Science students expect something from the teacher, they expect input. If the input does not come formatted the right way, they loose interest. I believe this is exactly what happened during this presentation. The delivery was not adapted to Computer Science students (this is a prerequisite of a presentation). It was more oriented towards an exchange of ideas. When the way of receiving information is not given before the information is sent to the listeners, the listeners use the default input format (this is starting to sound a bit technical). Listeners, like you, didn’t know how to receive that input. Decoding the input revealed there might be some communication issue in the middle. When somebody asked why we were called there, the input format was given - useless at that point. Nobody can rewind and apply the input format on the input given in the past.
Other than that, I really liked the 2nd section, the one about networking solutions. The initial delivery was indeed oriented towards people not knowing about networking - which is not entirely true in our case. After some time, the ‘level’ of the vocabulary has risen as the technical questions flowed in. That’s what I call a good live adjustment in presentation delivery.
The last section suffered from a short time-frame (with all the inherent problems). It was mostly oriented towards information, real facts. Computer Science students are used to technical specs. That’s what the last section offered. Other than that, it was nothing special about the delivery of that section.
I believe they planned a loose delivery, not time/plan constrained delivery and that lead to a conflict with the inner workings of the typical Computer Science student.
I wonder how the ASE students would have received it…
Razvan Musaloiu-E. on 11 Mar 2005 at 2:32 am #
I think the 2nd section was presented by Catalina Lehanceanu. I did not attend the event but I know Catalina and she is a great IT lady (my 2 cents).